Semantics. I think sometimes people use terminology to
attempt to justify what they do and their existence.
Rescued greyhounds
are not re-homed. A dog that never had a
home can’t be re-homed. They are homed.
Greyhounds
coming off the track were never in a home.
Unless you consider living in a cage and running for your life a
home.
It is
homing for a dog who should never have been in that place to start with.
And I find
it tragic there are those who broadcast racing greyhounds off the track are “retired”
greyhounds.
Those who
claim these racing hounds are retired, please explain retired from what.
As a
working person, retirement means I chose this profession and work so that I may
one day retire.
I was not
bred and born for the sole purpose of earning money.
Nor was I
judged at a young age whether or not I could “make the grade”.
There was
never a thought of culling and no one ever judged me to not being good enough.
No one put
my life in danger of electrocution or a broken back or a broken neck or leg where a
track quack would administer pentobarbital.
Or taken off site for a shot in the head.
I wonder
how many of these dogs at Shawfield “retired” and were “re-homed”.
More
important, how many met the quack vet.
Shared
from Grey Exploitations:
“Last night at Shawfield dog track
and for the 3rd time in as many months - the traps failed to be removed from
the track during a race. The hare was stopped at the third bend - resulting is
sheer carnage with only 2 dogs finishing the course.
We will never know the fates of these poor dogs - as the industry is self regulated and accountable to no one.”
We will never know the fates of these poor dogs - as the industry is self regulated and accountable to no one.”
Sums the industry up in a nutshell.
My angels
are rescued and homed. NOT “retired” nor
“re-homed”.
No comments:
Post a Comment